On various online forums, and even real time conversations with others somehow connected to the industry, this question or topic came up. I can see where both sides of the argument fall, but my simple answer is “no”. Not every amateur is trying to be a pro. Even if so, we all have to learn and start somewhere. Learning should be encouraged, I have no problem helping anyone who has a passion and will listen. I believe it’s important to network and not view each other as competition. All our work is different. All our personalities are different, therefore we’ll all have different clientele. Also none of us know everything or can afford to be separatists for fear that someone will take all our secrets and run with them. Silly. We can all learn from each other, and there is always more to learn. In following paragraphs I will support my theory about why amateurs are not killing it for us all.
There are a lot of talented up and coming shooters who just need field experience, and haven’t learned the business end yet, and some not so talented who think they have. Take for example the new $50.00 headshot guy. His customer probably needs the headshot to submit to their agency or for their corporate headshot. What are the chances the lighting and composition will be good, and the mood fits the purpose of the photo? Assuming this person has little or no professional training or experience to understand the dynamics and how they work together . If not, the headshots will not be useful. In his mind, his cheaper price compensates for having less field experience and background, and established name. Some can get by with that, others cannot. Or the Craigslist “Uncle Joe” wedding photographer, who shoots weddings for $300.00. I admire his hustle and eager spirit, but as stated in past blogs, I think it’s disingenuous to market yourself as a pro if you aren’t qualified to do the job. But some people can’t afford a pro. Just so they know, Uncle Joe shows up with one entry level SLR and a kit lens and popup flash, probably no spare batteries or fast enough lenses to shoot in low light, no studio lighting or hot shoe flashes, no contracts, no backup body in case of failure….this is an event that is a one time shot, a pro carries backup everything and is prepared. Uncle Joe will probably hand a disc of the photos with no quality control or post production, all of which the average person has no idea what to do with. This is what his customers don’t think about. Yet you can bet they expect results….those who want to spend the least often expect the most, and Uncle Joe is treading on thin ice. But to some, he’s better than no one, so he’s needed. Anyone who would hire him would have no intention of hiring me, or any of my respected colleagues anyhow……so no, amateurs don’t hurt pros in that regard.
Even commercial budgets have slimmed down in this tough time…..some are trying the amateurs or haggling with pros, or even buying stock images, which that market is way down….this is a slump. I don’t think it will stay this way. Sooner or later someone will need to make some money. When companies slack on their image by hiring those less qualified or buying the same stock images others have, sooner or later the presentation value will go down to it’s prospective clients, and cream will have to eventually rise to the top. Most in this market are not fooled by lesser skill set or knowledge of the business. That being said, there’s no substitute for the real thing. Some will learn this the hard way, some will never learn…..others know. With the influx of digital and more photographers surfacing, all of our marketing skills have to be better than ever, and making a presentation helping people see the value of our services is the biggest challenge the amateurs provide. I don’t think of them as enemies, or pros vs. amateurs. I hope those that are trying to excel, do so. Especially if they are trying to learn and not take short cuts. I might add that not all pros are worth their salt just because they are pros….it’s survival of the fittest like any other business.